On After-Trial Properties of Best Neyman-Pearson Confidence Intervals
نویسنده
چکیده
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
منابع مشابه
Philosophy of Science Association On After - Trial Criticisms of Neyman - Pearson
On After-Trial Criticisms of Neyman-Pearson Theory of Statistics Author(s): Deborah G. Mayo Source: PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1982, Volume One: Contributed Papers (1982), pp. 145-158 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Philosophy of Science Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/192663 Accessed...
متن کاملOrdering Algorithms and Confidence Intervals in the Presence of Nuisance Parameters
We discuss some issues arising in the evaluation of confidence intervals in the presence of nuisance parameters (systematic uncertainties) by means of direct Neyman construction in multi–dimensional space. While this kind of procedure provides rigorous coverage, it may be affected by large overcoverage, and/or produce results with counterintuitive behavior with respect to the uncertainty on the...
متن کاملGeneralized Neyman-pearson Lemma via Convex Duality
We extend the classical Neyman-Pearson theory for testing composite hypotheses versus composite alternatives, using a convex duality approach as in Witting (1985). Results of Aubin & Ekeland (1984) from non-smooth convex analysis are employed, along with a theorem of Komlós (1967), in order to establish the existence of a max-min optimal test in considerable generality, and to investigate its p...
متن کاملGeneralized Neyman - Pearson Lemma
We extend the classical Neyman-Pearson theory for testing composite hypotheses versus composite alternatives, using a convex duality approach as in Witting (1985). Results of Aubin & Ekeland (1984) from non-smooth convex analysis are employed, along with a theorem of Komll os (1967), in order to establish the existence of a max-min optimal test and to investigate its properties. The theory is i...
متن کاملModels and Statistical Inference: The Controversy between Fisher and Neyman–Pearson
The main thesis of the paper is that in the case of modern statistics, the differences between the various concepts of models were the key to its formative controversies. The mathematical theory of statistical inference was mainly developed by Ronald A. Fisher, Jerzy Neyman, and Egon S. Pearson. Fisher on the one side and Neyman–Pearson on the other were involved often in a polemic controversy....
متن کامل